Brand Core · Brand Perception · Module

The identity–image gap

The distance between what the organisation intended and what arrived — and which of the two is wrong, because both answers occur.

The idea

How it works

The gap is measured by comparing what the organisation says it stands for with what came back unprompted. It is uncomfortable and it is the most valuable output in this object.

Two very different diagnoses look identical in the data. Either the message did not reach people, or it reached them and was not believed. The first is a communication problem; the second is a behaviour problem, and treating one as the other wastes years.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Compare unprompted image against stated identity

    Word for word where possible. Paraphrasing on either side hides the gap.

  2. 02

    Ask whether it was heard or disbelieved

    People who recall the claim and reject it are a different group from people who never encountered it.

  3. 03

    Consider that the identity may be wrong

    Sometimes the market is right and the organisation is describing something it stopped being.

  4. 04

    Rank gaps by consequence

    Not every misperception matters. The ones affecting purchase or hiring do.

One level in

The components of the identity–image gap

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The comparison

    Stated identity against unprompted image, side by side.

    Learn
  2. The diagnosis

    Whether the message was unheard, heard and disbelieved, or accurate and unwelcome.

    Learn
  3. The priority gaps

    The misperceptions that affect what people actually do.

    Learn

Consider that the identity may be the wrong half. Sometimes the market is describing what the organisation actually became.