Established model

Marketing mix modelling

Developed in econometrics from the 1960s · 1960s

Statistical estimation of what each channel actually contributed, using aggregate data rather than tracking anyone.

Its place in the frameworkMarket CoreMarketing Channels

What it does

Regression of outcomes on spend across channels, with adjustments for seasonality, price, distribution and the fact that advertising keeps working after it stops. It has returned to prominence for an unglamorous reason: it needs no individual-level tracking, which makes it robust to everything that has happened to cookies and consent.

Reach for it when
When channels are each claiming the same conversions, and when attribution based on tracking is no longer available or believable.
Where it stops
It needs years of data and real variation in spend to say anything, and correlation across channels that always move together cannot be separated however good the model is.

Developed in marketing econometrics from the 1960s; see Dominique M. Hanssens, Leonard J. Parsons & Randall L. Schultz, Market Response Models, 1990.

Why it sits at Marketing Channels

How demand is created and reached: which channels are used, what each actually costs and returns, how they combine, and how any of that is known.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

All of Marketing Channels

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Marketing Channels lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at Marketing Channels too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

Elsewhere in Market Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 125 models