Established model

Three horizons

Baghai, Coley & White · 1999

Separating the business you are running from the one you are building and the one you are only betting on.

Its place in the frameworkGoal CoreLong term goals

What it does

Horizon one defends and extends what already earns; horizon two builds what is emerging; horizon three places options on what might exist later. Each needs different funding, different measures and different people, and the model exists because judging all three by the first one’s standards kills the other two every time.

Reach for it when
When long-term goals and this quarter’s numbers are being argued in the same meeting with the same yardstick.
Where it stops
The horizons are a way of talking, not a portfolio theory. Nothing in it says how much belongs in each, and it is easily used to protect pet projects from any measurement at all.

Mehrdad Baghai, Stephen Coley & David White, The Alchemy of Growth, Perseus, 1999.

Why it sits at Long term goals

The far horizon: where the organisation intends to be in years rather than quarters. Long term goals give the short ones a direction to point in, and are the first thing to go missing when a company is busy.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

All of Long term goals

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Long term goals lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at Long term goals too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

Elsewhere in Goal Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 125 models