Attractive and fitting are different tests
A large growing market the organisation has no right to win is not an opportunity for it. Most opportunity documents assess only the first half.
Market Core · Object
Where demand exists that the organisation is not yet serving — sized honestly, judged on fit as well as attractiveness, and narrowed to a list short enough to act on.
The term
An opportunity is demand that exists and is not being met well. Establishing that it exists is a research question; establishing that the organisation should serve it is a strategy question, and the two are routinely collapsed into one enthusiastic slide.
Sizing is where most of the error enters. Numbers assembled from analyst reports describe a category rather than a reachable market, and the gap between the two is usually an order of magnitude.
The output of this object is not an analysis. It is a short list of opportunities the organisation has decided to pursue and a longer list it has decided not to, both dated.
Why it earns a place
A large growing market the organisation has no right to win is not an opportunity for it. Most opportunity documents assess only the first half.
Pricing, capacity, hiring and investment all rest on the number. An order-of-magnitude error at this stage is not recoverable further down.
Opportunities the organisation looked at and declined, with the reason and the date, prevent the same enthusiasm arriving again in two years.
One level in
Four working areas. The first two establish what is there, the third judges it, and the fourth narrows it to something the organisation can act on.
Where the demand is heading and what is driving it. A shrinking market with a large current size is a different proposition from a small one growing quickly.
LearnAttractiveness and fit, judged separately. The first asks whether the opportunity is worth having; the second asks whether this organisation has any right to it.
LearnWhat the organisation has decided to pursue, and what it has decided not to. Both dated, because both will be revisited by someone who was not there.
LearnAcross the framework
Beyond the framework
The Omnigoal says where this belongs and what it touches. It does not tell you how to think about it — other people have done that, and done it well. These are theirs.
A checklist of the outside forces a business does not control: political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legal.
Its whole function is coverage. Left to themselves, teams scan the two categories they are already worried about, and the change that eventually matters arrives from the one nobody was watching. The letters have accumulated over the decades; the discipline of going through all of them has not changed.
Developed from Francis J. Aguilar, Scanning the Business Environment, Macmillan, 1967.
Internal strengths and weaknesses set against external opportunities and threats.
Its lasting contribution is the axis nobody names: two of the boxes are about you and two are about the world, and an opportunity only counts if a strength can actually reach it. Used as four lists it is nearly worthless; used as a set of pairings — which strength serves which opportunity, which weakness is exposed to which threat — it still earns its place.
Edmund P. Learned, C. Roland Christensen, Kenneth R. Andrews & William D. Guth, Business Policy: Text and Cases, Irwin, 1965; also attributed to Albert S. Humphrey at SRI.
Also known as Market sizing in three layers
The whole market, the part your model can serve, and the part you could realistically win.
Three nested figures, each narrower and each requiring a different argument. The discipline is in the narrowing: the total is usually available from a report, the serviceable portion requires you to state what your business actually cannot do, and the obtainable share requires you to name who else is there.
Standard venture and corporate development practice; no single origin.
Products pass through introduction, growth, maturity and decline, and what to do about one depends entirely on where it is.
Spending to build awareness makes sense in the first stage and is waste in the third; defending share matters in maturity and is money lost in decline. The stage also predicts who else is in the market: growth attracts entrants, maturity produces price competition, and decline leaves whoever can run it cheapest.
Theodore Levitt, “Exploit the Product Life Cycle”, Harvard Business Review, 1965; the concept predates the article.
These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.
Every model in the framework, and where each one belongsSize from the bottom up and state what is reachable. Category figures from analyst reports are usually an order of magnitude out.
Analyses the competitive landscape to inform strategic decisions and identify opportunities for differentiation.
LearnFocus on the specific segments within these target markets that marketing campaigns or messages are designed to engage directly.
LearnDefine and structure the key stages of your customer’s journey, detailing the actions that guide them from awareness to loyalty.
LearnThe platforms and methods used to promote and communicate with potential customers.
LearnOrganise and plan content by focus areas like company updates, industry trends, and global events.
LearnOrganise and schedule your content activities to align with key dates throughout the year.
LearnThe various pathways through which a company sells its products or services to customers.
Learn