Market Core · Object

Market Opportunities

Where demand exists that the organisation is not yet serving — sized honestly, judged on fit as well as attractiveness, and narrowed to a list short enough to act on.

The term

What it is

An opportunity is demand that exists and is not being met well. Establishing that it exists is a research question; establishing that the organisation should serve it is a strategy question, and the two are routinely collapsed into one enthusiastic slide.

Sizing is where most of the error enters. Numbers assembled from analyst reports describe a category rather than a reachable market, and the gap between the two is usually an order of magnitude.

The output of this object is not an analysis. It is a short list of opportunities the organisation has decided to pursue and a longer list it has decided not to, both dated.

Why it earns a place

What goes wrong without it

01

Attractive and fitting are different tests

A large growing market the organisation has no right to win is not an opportunity for it. Most opportunity documents assess only the first half.

02

Sizing errors compound into everything downstream

Pricing, capacity, hiring and investment all rest on the number. An order-of-magnitude error at this stage is not recoverable further down.

03

The rejected list is the useful one

Opportunities the organisation looked at and declined, with the reason and the date, prevent the same enthusiasm arriving again in two years.

One level in

The modules within market opportunities

Four working areas. The first two establish what is there, the third judges it, and the fourth narrows it to something the organisation can act on.

  1. Sizing

    How large the opportunity actually is, built from the bottom up rather than taken from a report, and stated as what is reachable rather than what exists.

    Learn
  2. Growth and direction

    Where the demand is heading and what is driving it. A shrinking market with a large current size is a different proposition from a small one growing quickly.

    Learn
  3. Opportunity assessment

    Attractiveness and fit, judged separately. The first asks whether the opportunity is worth having; the second asks whether this organisation has any right to it.

    Learn
  4. The shortlist

    What the organisation has decided to pursue, and what it has decided not to. Both dated, because both will be revisited by someone who was not there.

    Learn

Across the framework

What it touches

  • Business CoreAn opportunity requires a value proposition and the capacity to serve it, which is where fit is actually settled.
  • Goal CoreA pursued opportunity becomes a long term goal or it remains an observation.
  • CompetitorsAn unserved opportunity is unusual; establishing why nobody is serving it is part of the assessment.
  • Time CoreWhether the opportunity is available now is a separate question from whether it exists.

Beyond the framework

Models worth knowing here

The Omnigoal says where this belongs and what it touches. It does not tell you how to think about it — other people have done that, and done it well. These are theirs.

  1. PESTEL analysis

    Developed from Francis J. Aguilar’s scanning work · 1967

    A checklist of the outside forces a business does not control: political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legal.

    Its whole function is coverage. Left to themselves, teams scan the two categories they are already worried about, and the change that eventually matters arrives from the one nobody was watching. The letters have accumulated over the decades; the discipline of going through all of them has not changed.

    Reach for it when
    At the start of opportunity work, and once a year regardless of whether anything seems to be happening.
    Where it stops
    It produces a list, not a judgement. Without a second step that asks how likely and how consequential each item is, it is a wall of observations.

    Developed from Francis J. Aguilar, Scanning the Business Environment, Macmillan, 1967.

  2. SWOT analysis

    Attributed to Albert S. Humphrey and to the Harvard policy group · 1965

    Internal strengths and weaknesses set against external opportunities and threats.

    Its lasting contribution is the axis nobody names: two of the boxes are about you and two are about the world, and an opportunity only counts if a strength can actually reach it. Used as four lists it is nearly worthless; used as a set of pairings — which strength serves which opportunity, which weakness is exposed to which threat — it still earns its place.

    Reach for it when
    To connect what a business has to what the market is doing, once both have been established separately.
    Where it stops
    It is the most abused tool in strategy. Filled in as four columns of adjectives, it generates agreement and no decisions.

    Edmund P. Learned, C. Roland Christensen, Kenneth R. Andrews & William D. Guth, Business Policy: Text and Cases, Irwin, 1965; also attributed to Albert S. Humphrey at SRI.

  3. TAM, SAM and SOM

    Venture and corporate development practice · 1990s

    Also known as Market sizing in three layers

    The whole market, the part your model can serve, and the part you could realistically win.

    Three nested figures, each narrower and each requiring a different argument. The discipline is in the narrowing: the total is usually available from a report, the serviceable portion requires you to state what your business actually cannot do, and the obtainable share requires you to name who else is there.

    Reach for it when
    Whenever an opportunity is being sized, and particularly when the number came from a market report.
    Where it stops
    Every layer is an estimate resting on the one above it. A top-down calculation can be made to produce almost any answer, and usually is.

    Standard venture and corporate development practice; no single origin.

  4. The product life cycle

    Popularised by Theodore Levitt · 1965

    Products pass through introduction, growth, maturity and decline, and what to do about one depends entirely on where it is.

    Spending to build awareness makes sense in the first stage and is waste in the third; defending share matters in maturity and is money lost in decline. The stage also predicts who else is in the market: growth attracts entrants, maturity produces price competition, and decline leaves whoever can run it cheapest.

    Reach for it when
    When an opportunity is being judged on its own merits without asking how old the market around it is.
    Where it stops
    The stages are obvious backwards and hard to identify at the time — a dip can be decline or a pause, and treating it as decline can make it one. Nothing in the model says how long a stage lasts.

    Theodore Levitt, “Exploit the Product Life Cycle”, Harvard Business Review, 1965; the concept predates the article.

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

Every model in the framework, and where each one belongs

Size from the bottom up and state what is reachable. Category figures from analyst reports are usually an order of magnitude out.