Established model

The Customer Effort Score

Dixon, Freeman & Toman · 2010

Also known as CES

Ask how hard the customer had to work, because reducing effort predicts loyalty better than delighting does.

Its place in the frameworkOmni CoreCustomer Feedback

What it does

The underlying study found that exceeding expectations in service barely moved loyalty, while making things difficult destroyed it — and that most service interactions are a chance to lose a customer rather than to win one. Measuring effort points attention at the same place: removing obstacles rather than adding delight.

Reach for it when
In support and self-service, where the ambition of delighting people is expensive and mostly wasted.
Where it stops
It measures one interaction, not the relationship. A product people love can be effortful, and effort is not always something the customer wants removed.

Matthew Dixon, Karen Freeman & Nicholas Toman, “Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers”, Harvard Business Review, 2010.

Why it sits at Customer Feedback

What customers tell you about the experience: gathered where they will answer honestly, read for what it actually says, routed to whoever can act, and returned to the person who raised it.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

All of Customer Feedback

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Customer Feedback lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at Customer Feedback too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

Elsewhere in Omni Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 125 models