Brand Core · Brand Positioning · Module

Points of difference

What the brand is meant to be believed better at, held alongside the parity points it has to be credibly adequate on to be considered at all.

The idea

How it works

Most positioning failures are parity failures. A brand that is genuinely better at one thing and visibly inadequate at a category requirement is not considered at all, and the difference is never weighed.

A point of difference has three requirements: it must matter to the customer, be deliverable by the organisation, and be difficult for competitors to claim. Failing any one of them makes it an assertion rather than a position.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    List the parity requirements first

    What must the brand be credibly adequate at to be considered? Those come before anything distinctive.

  2. 02

    Test the difference on all three criteria

    Matters to them, deliverable by us, hard for others to claim. Two out of three is not a position.

  3. 03

    Name what you accept being worse at

    A position with no trade-off is not a position. The accepted weakness is what makes the strength possible.

  4. 04

    Check whether a competitor could say it

    Substitute their name into the sentence. If it still reads as true, the difference is category-level.

One level in

The components of points of difference

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The parity points

    What the brand must be credibly adequate at to be considered.

    Learn
  2. The differences

    What the brand is meant to be believed better at, tested on all three criteria.

    Learn
  3. The accepted trade-off

    What the brand deliberately does not compete on.

    Learn

Most positioning failures are parity failures. Being inadequate at a category requirement means the difference is never weighed.