Business Core · Core Competencies · Module

Identification

Listing what the organisation genuinely does well, drawn from evidence rather than from self-image.

The idea

How it works

Self-assessment produces a list of things the organisation is proud of, which overlaps only partly with what it is actually distinctive at. Evidence produces a shorter and more useful list.

The best sources are behavioural: why customers chose you over an alternative, what they say when asked to compare, and what competitors have failed to copy despite trying.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Start from wins, not from opinions

    Look at recent competitive wins and ask what actually decided them. The answer is often not what the company thinks.

  2. 02

    Ask customers directly

    “Why us rather than them” produces better data than any internal workshop.

  3. 03

    Check what has been copied

    Anything competitors matched within a year was not a competency. That is useful information, not a criticism.

  4. 04

    Write candidates, not conclusions

    This module produces a list to be tested, not a list to be published.

One level in

The components of identification

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The candidate list

    Things the organisation might be distinctively good at, before testing.

    Learn
  2. The evidence file

    What supports each candidate — win reasons, customer statements, competitor failures to copy.

    Learn
  3. The self-image gap

    Where internal belief and external evidence disagree.

    Learn

The gap between what an organisation believes it is good at and what customers say decided the sale is usually the most useful output here.