Goal Core · Purpose · Module

Alignment

How the purpose is actually used: which decisions are tested against it, at what points, and by whom. Without a mechanism, alignment is an intention.

The idea

How it works

Alignment is a mechanism question, not a communication question. Repeating a purpose more often does not make it operative; attaching it to a specific moment in a specific process does.

The moments worth attaching it to are the ones where something is committed: budget approval, hiring above a certain level, entering a new market, signing a partner. If the purpose is not consulted at those points, it is not aligned to anything.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Find the commitment points

    List the moments where the organisation binds itself to something it cannot easily reverse.

  2. 02

    Attach the test

    At each point, add one question: how does this serve the stated purpose? Recorded, not merely asked.

  3. 03

    Name who asks it

    A test with no owner is skipped under time pressure, which is exactly when it matters.

  4. 04

    Review what it changed

    Once a year, look at what the test actually altered. If the answer is nothing, the test is ceremonial.

One level in

The components of alignment

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. Decision gates

    The named points in existing processes where the purpose test is applied.

    Learn
  2. The cascade record

    How the purpose translates into the goals beneath it — the traceable line from purpose to this quarter’s work.

    Learn
  3. The alignment review

    An annual note on what the test changed, and what it failed to catch.

    Learn

Alignment fails quietly. Nothing announces that a test has stopped being applied, which is why the review has to be scheduled rather than triggered.