Goal Core · Tactical goals · Module

Resourcing

What the goal costs in money, people and attention, agreed before it is committed to. The test is whether the owner could describe the resource without checking.

The idea

How it works

An unresourced goal is worse than no goal. It consumes attention, generates reporting and produces nothing, while occupying the slot a fundable goal could have used.

Money is usually the easiest of the three resources to secure and the least often the real constraint. Attention is the scarce one: the number of things a given team can genuinely hold at once is small, and it does not increase because more goals were assigned.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Cost it in people-weeks first

    Money can often be found. Time from the specific people who can do the work usually cannot.

  2. 02

    Check the owner’s existing load

    A new goal for someone already at capacity is a decision to drop something else, whether or not that is said out loud.

  3. 03

    Fund it or drop it

    The honest options are two. Leaving it on the list unfunded is the third and worst.

One level in

The components of resourcing

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The resource estimate

    People-weeks, money and any external dependency, stated before commitment.

    Learn
  2. The capacity check

    What the named owner and team are already carrying, and what this displaces.

    Learn
  3. The funding decision

    A recorded yes or no, with the trade-off it implied.

    Learn

The capacity check is the one usually skipped, and the one that most reliably explains why a well-formed plan produced nothing.