Business Core · HR · Module

Retention and engagement

Keeping the capability the organisation has already paid to build, and understanding why people stay or leave before the pattern becomes a problem.

The idea

How it works

Turnover is expensive in ways that appear in several budgets and no report. Recruitment cost, lost productivity, the time of everyone involved in handover, and the capability that simply leaves.

The distinction worth holding is between satisfaction and engagement. Satisfaction predicts staying; engagement predicts discretionary effort. An organisation can have a great deal of the first and very little of the second.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Separate regretted from unregretted departures

    An overall turnover figure hides the only number that matters: how many people left whom the organisation wanted to keep.

  2. 02

    Ask while people are still there

    Exit interviews arrive after the decision. Asking earlier is the only version that can change anything.

  3. 03

    Look for patterns by team and manager

    Turnover almost never distributes evenly. The concentration is the finding.

  4. 04

    Act on something

    Surveys that produce no visible change reduce engagement, because they demonstrate that being asked means nothing.

One level in

The components of retention and engagement

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The turnover record

    Departures split by regretted and unregretted, by team, over time.

    Learn
  2. The engagement read

    What people say about discretionary effort, kept separate from satisfaction.

    Learn
  3. The exit findings

    What leavers say, gathered and read for pattern rather than filed individually.

    Learn

A survey that produces no visible action costs more engagement than not asking would have. Only run one you intend to act on.