Established model

Herzberg’s two-factor theory

Frederick Herzberg · 1959

Also known as Motivation–hygiene theory

What makes people dissatisfied at work and what motivates them are two different lists, not two ends of one.

Its place in the frameworkBusiness CoreHR

What it does

Pay, conditions, policy and supervision are hygiene factors: get them wrong and people are unhappy, get them right and they are merely not unhappy. Achievement, recognition, responsibility and the work itself are what actually motivate. The consequence is uncomfortable and often ignored — you cannot fix a motivation problem by improving the conditions.

Reach for it when
When engagement is falling and the proposed answer is a benefit, a bonus or an office refurbishment.
Where it stops
The original method asked people to recall good and bad episodes, and people attribute the good to themselves and the bad to circumstance. The split is cleaner in the model than in the evidence.

Frederick Herzberg, Bernard Mausner & Barbara Snyderman, The Motivation to Work, Wiley, 1959.

Why it sits at HR

The people the organisation has, the people it needs, and everything between the two. HR is where capability stops being an abstraction and becomes a headcount with names attached.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

All of HR

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at HR lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at HR too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

Elsewhere in Business Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 125 models