Established model

The Kano model

Noriaki Kano · 1984

Some features delight, some merely satisfy in proportion, and some are only noticed when they are missing.

Its place in the frameworkBusiness CoreValue Proposition

What it does

It sorts what a product offers into categories with different relationships to satisfaction — the expected, where more brings no credit and absence brings anger; the linear, where more is straightforwardly better; and the unexpected, which delights precisely because nobody asked. Its sharpest observation is that categories decay: today’s delight becomes tomorrow’s expectation.

Reach for it when
When deciding what to build next and every candidate feature is being argued as equally important.
Where it stops
Placing a feature in a category depends on a survey with a particular question format, and the answers move with market and segment. It is a snapshot, not a property of the feature.

Noriaki Kano et al., “Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality”, Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 1984.

Why it sits at Value Proposition

What the organisation offers, stated in terms of what it does for someone. A value proposition is a claim about the customer, not a description of the product.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

All of Value Proposition

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Value Proposition lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at Value Proposition too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

Elsewhere in Business Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 125 models