Time Core · Market Timing · Module

Early and late

What each error costs — asymmetric, and usually assessed as though it were not.

The idea

How it works

First-mover advantage is real under specific conditions — network effects, switching costs, scarce resources locked up — and absent otherwise. Assuming it generally is the most expensive timing error available.

Entering early costs cash for longer and educates the market for whoever follows. Entering late costs a harder position against an established incumbent. Both are survivable and they are survivable differently.

Working with it

In practice

  1. 01

    Check whether first-mover advantage applies here

    Network effects, switching costs or locked resources. Where none is present, following is cheaper and frequently better.

  2. 02

    Cost the early error in cash

    How long the organisation would fund a market that is not ready. That is the actual constraint.

  3. 03

    Cost the late error in position

    What it takes to displace an incumbent, which is considerably more than reaching an empty market.

  4. 04

    Decide which error you can survive

    They are not equally recoverable, and which one is worse depends on the organisation rather than on the market.

One level in

The components of early and late

A component is something that exists afterwards which did not exist before — a deliverable or a mechanism, not an intention.

  1. The early cost

    What entering before the market is ready would consume.

    Learn
  2. The late cost

    What displacing an established position would take.

    Learn
  3. The advantage test

    Whether being first actually confers anything here.

    Learn

First-mover advantage holds under specific conditions. Assuming it generally is the most expensive timing error.