Established model
From multi-channel to omni-channel
Peter C. Verhoef, P. K. Kannan & J. Jeffrey Inman · 2015
Also known as Omni-channel retailing
Channels stop being separate businesses and become parts of one experience that the customer moves through freely.
Its place in the frameworkOmni Core›Omnichannel Integration
What it does
Multi-channel thinking manages each channel for its own results; omni-channel thinking manages the customer’s whole path across them, including touchpoints the company does not own. The practical consequence is that a channel can be worth keeping even when its own sales look poor, because of what it does for sales that close somewhere else.
- Reach for it when
- When each channel has its own targets and they compete for the same customer, and when a store or site is judged only on the sales recorded there.
- Where it stops
- It describes the direction of travel more than a method. Attributing value across channels remains difficult, and full integration can cost more than it returns for a small business.
Peter C. Verhoef, P. K. Kannan & J. Jeffrey Inman, “From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing: Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing”, Journal of Retailing, 2015.
Why it sits at Omnichannel Integration
Making the organisation behave as one thing across every channel a customer uses: one identity, continuous state, comparable capability, and no visible seams.
A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:
- One identityIdentity-resolution practice and the single-customer-view problem, including the accuracy trade in probabilistic matching.
- Continuity of stateService-design work on continuity, and the customer-effort research showing repetition as a primary driver of dissatisfaction.
- Channel parityMultichannel-service literature on functional consistency and the cost of maintaining full parity.
- The seamsService-blueprint analysis of failure points at organisational boundaries.
What it touches elsewhere
Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Omnichannel Integration lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.
- Customer Journey MappingThe handovers identified in the map are the seams this object works on.
- Data CoreIdentity resolution is a data problem before it is an experience problem.
- Market CoreSales and marketing channels are part of the same experience whoever owns them.
- Business CoreMost integration failures follow organisational boundaries, not technical ones.
Filed at the same place
These answer questions that arise at Omnichannel Integration too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.
- Showrooming and webroomingPeople deliberately research in one channel and buy in another, and the pattern is stable enough to plan around.
Elsewhere in Omni Core
- The service blueprint
- Moments of truth
- The customer satisfaction index
- Net Promoter Score
- The Customer Effort Score
- SERVQUAL and the gaps model
- Service recovery
- Nielsen’s usability heuristics
- The double diamond
- The Fogg Behaviour Model
- RFM analysis
- Collaborative filtering
- Behavioural and attitudinal loyalty
- The service–profit chain
These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.
All 166 models