Effectuation — What It Is, and Where It Belongs

What it does

Studying expert founders, Sarasvathy found reasoning that runs the opposite way to planning: begin with who you are, what you know and whom you know; commit only what you can afford to lose; bring in partners who shape the venture by committing to it; and treat surprises as material rather than threats. Where prediction is impossible, control over what you can influence replaces it.

Reach for it when: When a new venture is waiting for a market forecast that nobody can honestly produce, and when a business plan is being written for a market that does not yet exist.
Where it stops: It describes how experts act under real uncertainty; it is weaker where the market is known and prediction works well enough. It also offers no guarantee that the goal that emerges is worth having.

Saras D. Sarasvathy, “Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency”, Academy of Management Review, 2001; Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise, Edward Elgar, 2008.

Why it sits at Innovation

The capability to produce new offers, processes and business models: where ideas come from, how they are tested, and how each one is scaled into operation or stopped.

A model is only useful when you reach for it at the right moment. This one answers a question that arises here — so it is filed here, and nowhere else. These are the working areas it serves:

Sources of ideasPeter F. Drucker, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1985, on the seven sources of innovative opportunity; Henry Chesbrough, Open Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, 2003, on ideas crossing the organisation’s boundary in both directions.
ExperimentsEric Ries, The Lean Startup, 2011; Steve Blank, The Four Steps to the Epiphany, 2005, on customer development; Stefan Thomke, Experimentation Matters, Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
Pipeline and gatesRobert G. Cooper, “Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products”, Business Horizons, 1990.
Scaling or stoppingCharles A. O’Reilly III & Michael L. Tushman, “The Ambidextrous Organization”, Harvard Business Review, 2004; Barry M. Staw, “Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, on escalation of commitment.

All of Innovation

What it touches elsewhere

Nothing in a business is decided on its own. A conclusion reached with this model at Innovation lands in these other cores, whether or not anyone follows it there.

Value PropositionA tested offer joins the value proposition at handover; from then on its jobs, claims and proof are kept there, not here.
Long term goalsGrowth horizons decides how much effort each horizon receives; the innovation pipeline is one of the main things that allocation is spent on.
Golden OpportunitiesExceptional external windows are recognised and seized there; one enters this pipeline only when it needs testing before it can be taken.
Project managementOnce a gate funds defined work with an end, that work is run as a project there; the gate decision itself stays here.
Core CompetenciesBuilding capability in general belongs to Core Competencies; innovation draws on competencies and sometimes reveals missing ones, without owning them.
TechnologyThe technology estate and the use of AI are held under Technology; new technology appears here as a source of ideas and as something a test may need.
Performance AnalysisThe statistical method for controlled experiments is kept in Performance Analysis; this object decides which assumptions to test and what result would change a decision.

Filed at the same place

These answer questions that arise at Innovation too. Where they disagree with this one, the disagreement is the useful part.

The Lean StartupTreat a new offer as a set of assumptions to be tested cheaply, rather than a plan to be executed.
Stage-gateWork proceeds in stages separated by decision points where a project can be stopped.
Open innovationGood ideas can come into a company from outside and go out of it to others, and both directions can create value.

Elsewhere in Business Core

These are other people’s models, named here so you can go to the source and use them properly. The Omnigoal is not affiliated with their authors and is not endorsed by them; nothing of theirs is reproduced here — no canvas, no diagram, no wording. Each is described in our own words, with the originator credited, because the framework is a place to put thinking, not a replacement for the people who did it. Model names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here only to refer to the work itself.

All 166 models